#106 - Experimental Phase

Motto: The Regularity

Life gets boring if you let it. You can preclude boringness in millions of ways, some healthier than others. I like to make changes to things. Change systems. Change setups. Change routines. Change sometimes for the sake of change. 

A change I wanted to try out, at least for a while, was making the Column a regular thing. As I mentioned in my post two days ago, I am going to change the update frequency on the Column from "whenever I feel like it" to every Thursday and Sunday.

Seems like a good change. I'm going to try this for a month or so, just to see how it feels.

And now, for something entirely different.

A good friend of mine has an birthday fast approaching. She took some time to reflect on her previous year and decided she wanted to make what she called a "bucket list" for the upcoming year of her life. I decided I like the idea, so I decided to do what I do best: blatantly and unashamedly copy the idea I like.

Here's a sampling of my Bucket List for my 25th Year:
  • Watch a KU home basketball game
  • Watch a KU away game
  • Go to St. Louis for a weekend
  • Enter in a pool tournament
  • Enter in a race of some sort
  • Write an Android application
I want to do all that.

(and, you know, buy a car and get married and stuff)

Just a warning, what follows this line is nerdy and has an admittedly small intended audience.

If you aren't using Google+ already, you should be. That is my standard preface for any Google+ related news. The news is that the Google+ App is getting an update that I'm reasonably excited for. The biggest changes include the removal of the vestigial "Messenger" app and the new optional integration with photos and videos stored in Google Drive. Considering I have a terabyte of Drive space and hate app baggage on my phone, I'm pretty happy.

I just deleted 3.1 paragraphs about other Google+ stuff. This post is wordy. Here's a screenshot of my Google Drive picture folder "2013" in Google+:


Your Google Drive pictures are private until you choose to share them.
I recently watched a video of XKCD author (and one of my personal heroes) Randall Munroe giving a talk at Google (another personal hero, albeit a corporate one). During this talk someone asked him about the name, "'XKCD', what does it mean?" He gave the answer that I already knew, it is meaningless. It's just the name he's always used. We went on to talk about why it is what it is. He said his goal was to find a "unique point in the space of four-character strings". When he was looking for a name, he wanted something that met the following criteria:
  • No letters could be mistaken for other letters or number in either case
  • No obvious acronym decoding
  • Not pronounceable
  • When you Google it, you only find things that are related to (me)
I love this idea. So, I decided to blatantly and unashamedly copy the idea I like.

Here were my base criteria:
  • 4 characters, letters only
  • No obvious acronyms
  • Not pronouncable
  • When you Google it, you find less than 10 results
After Googling for a bit I found out there are probably zero sets of 4 characters that meet the last criteria alone. Note that I didn't try all 457 thousand possible inputs.

So I relaxed a bit on the first criteria.
  • 4 characters, letters only including numbers
After Googling things for 20 minutes, I found very few potential strings that returned less than 1 million results. Yes, things like "X2VL" still return 8.6 million results.

So I relaxed a bit more on the first criteria.
  • 4 5 characters, letters only
After Googling things for 20 minutes, I found out most strings still returned at least 2500 results. Yes, things like "QJKPL" return 3360 results.

So I relaxed even more on the first criteria.
  • 4 5 characters, letters only including numbers
That's gotta do it, right?

The lowest return for a set of 5 letters and numbers I could find was 149 results for the string "J7RX5".

That's still 15 times more results than I wanted, but it's the best to this point.

I'm going to skip a step and say that, according to my experimentation, to return less than 10 results on a Google search, you need to have at least 6 letters and numbers.

If you find out I'm wrong, tell me what string you used. I want it.

Note that all the strings I'm listing anywhere in this post will eventually up the number of results they yield.


Top 5: Best Strings I Could Feasibly Use
5. J7RX5 - Returns 149 results
4. V9Z23 - Returns 107 results (a new low score using 5 characters!)
3. VZXMWL - Returns 42 results
2. K1P3VS - Returns 3 results, but looks like "Kip, 3, Versus"
1. AAROGIL - Returns 5 Google results, but is 7 characters long and isn't meaningless


Quote:
“Are you from this country? ... You are the tallest man I've ever seen.”
- a guy from a foreign country that I couldn't quite place said this to me on the elevator -
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

#130 - Feature: The Marvel Cinematic Universe

#177 - A Column about Nothing (the Way It's Supposed to Be)

#294 - My 27th Year